Gilgamesh, A King. At Uruk.

[4thofeleven]

I picked up a copy of The Epic of Gilgamesh the other day at the university bookstore while I was buying some textbooks. There’s something exciting about reading a story five thousand years old – the age of the story is impressive, even compared to the classical Greek mythology I’m used to. It is old enough that most of the surviving fragments are themselves second generation Babylonian translations of what was even then an incomplete Sumerian version – several of the Babylonian tablets include the original scribe’s notes that lines are missing from the source they were originally copying from.

It’s a pretty good read, once you get used to the style and the occasional gaps. It’s not a particularly cheerful read, though – the focus of the story is Gilgamesh coming to terms with his mortality. It’s kinda cute that Gilgamesh eventually realises that his quest for immortality is futile, and that he should be focusing on ensuring his deeds are remembered after his death – a rather appropriate theme for the oldest surviving work of human literature, no?

It’s interesting for me coming from a classicist background to compare Gilgamesh to the Greek heroes. See, the thing about the Greek heroes is that, well, they’re jerks. Agamemnon? Jerk. Achilles? Petulant jerk. Jason? An asshole on such a massive scale that Medea’s murder of their children seems an almost justifiable response. Odysseus? Better than the rest, but in a ‘magnificent bastard’ sort of way, rather than in a ‘worthy of emulation’ sort of way. So I found it rather refreshing that, yes, Gilgamesh is a jerk – but the whole story is about how he stops being a jerk! He's an absolute bastard to his subjects, so the gods send Enkidu to knock some sense into him. He goes off into the wilderness like any good archetypal hero, to complete a great quest – only to fail it completely and realise what a selfish jerk he’s being, going off questing for immortality while leaving Uruk without a leader. It's a nice change to have a hero who's hubris leads to him - well, realising he's being a dick, rather than just leading to his death.

Another fun note – about a third of the way in, Gilgamesh rebuffs the advances of the goddess of love, Ishtar. Why? Well, because like in all mythologies, getting sexually involved with deities isn’t good for your long-term health or prosperity. I find it pretty neat that Gilgamesh is already familiar enough with Ishtar’s reputation to automatically reject her; he’s probably one of the few mythical heroes who’s actually paid attention to previous myths. I imagine that if it ever came up, he’d also prove be genre savvy enough to check for alternate interpretations of prophesies, and to be very careful about the phrasing of any wishes he gets… *grin*

Can anyone recommend any good sources on other Sumerian or Babylonian myths? I’m thinking this is a mythology I want to become more familiar with.

Comments

[fialleril.livejournal.com]

Gilgamesh! :D Oh, I love Gilgamesh. I love how he's acknowledged as the greatest hero of all time, and yet he still ultimately fails even at staying awake for required periods of time. And I love that he actually learns something from his fail.

I find he's very interesting in comparison with Beowulf, actually. They seem to have a surprisingly great number of things in common.

Also, your description of Greek heroes is quite apt. Especially Jason's. ;)

As for further Babylonian myths, the Enûma Eliš (the creation myth) is always a good place to start. Here is a wikipedia page for it, of all things. LOL.

[4thofeleven.livejournal.com]

Wikipedia actually isn't that bad when it comes to mythology; I'm guessing that the same obsessive collecting personality type that results in people writing massive entries for obscure members of the X-Men also results in people writing similarly overly detailed entries for obscure Near-East deities... *grin*

[fialleril.livejournal.com]

Ha! You're probably right. Thank goodness for obsessive collecting personalities. ;)